|
商品の詳細:
|
| 項目名: | 唇の光沢の管 | 容量: | 15ml |
|---|---|---|---|
| 色: | カスタマイズされた | MOQ: | 10000個 |
| 材料: | プラスチック | ||
| ハイライト: | 15ml Capacity Lip Gloss Tube,PE Material Lip Gloss Container,PP Material Lip Gloss Packaging |
||
This is the most common comparison in plastic packaging.
| Feature | Polyethylene (PE) | Polypropylene (PP) | Winner for Lip Gloss |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oil Resistance | Excellent | Good | PE (slightly better for very oily formulas) |
| Clarity | Good (can be clarified) | Excellent (inherently clearer) | PP |
| Rigidity/Hardness | Softer, more flexible | Harder, more rigid | PP (feels more "premium") |
| Stress Crack Resistance | Excellent | Good | PE |
| Cost | Low | Low | Tie |
Conclusion: While both are used extensively, PE is often chosen for its superior resistance to stress cracking caused by oils over long periods. PP is often chosen when superior clarity or a more rigid feel is desired.
The material doesn't change the styles available. The same classic types are manufactured in PE:
Standard Doe-Foot Tube: The most common type.
Brush Applicator Tube: For liquid lipsticks and precise application.
Slant-Tip Tube: No separate applicator; product is applied directly from the slanted opening.
Jumbo Tube: Larger diameter for more product.
| Advantages | Disadvantages |
|---|---|
| Excellent product compatibility with oily/waxy formulas. | Less crystal-clear than PP, often having a slightly hazy or milky tone even in "clear" versions. |
| High resistance to stress cracking. | Softer feel can be perceived as less premium than the harder feel of PP. |
| Good moisture barrier protects the product. | Can be more susceptible to scratching. |
| Durable and shatterproof. | |
| Cost-effective for mass production. |  |
コンタクトパーソン: Mr. Jacky
電話番号: 0086-15168562344
